|
Error processing SSI file |
|
||||||||
the third annual NOAA Science Camp, an educational camp for middle school students designed to showcase NOAA science and researchers.
Fifty students entering 7th or 8th grade in fall 2005 (49 students from 27 schools in the greater Seattle area, and 1 home-schooled
student) participated in hands-on science activities designed to demonstrate techniques used by NOAA scientists to study fisheries,
marine mammals, nautical charting, environmental assessment, diving, oceanography, and weather.
Employees from the University of Washington’s Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Ocean and Sea Grant Program, and independent contractors with NOAA were also involved in the development and implementation of science activities during the NOAA Science Camp. The fisheries activities, led by Rebecca Reuter (AFSC) and Casey Ralston (NWFSC) involved a salmon survival game that helped
campers understand not only why salmon naturally have a high mortality rate but also how human-placed obstacles can increase
salmon mortality. After playing the game once, the campers were assigned stakeholder roles (i.e., fisheries manager, member
of the business and fishing communities, Native American group, or biologist) in a salmon debate. In their roles, campers
discussed how humans can help increase salmon survival by either removing an obstacle or making it easier for the salmon to
pass a certain obstacle (e.g., decrease the number of fishing boats by decreasing the number of fishing permits), while addressing
other needs of the biological and human communities. Campers also learned how to identify fish and created fish prints. At the beginning of Science Camp, campers were introduced to an environmental scenario. Their task was to determine the source of a
hypothetical “fish kill” in Puget Sound, quantify its potential effects on the ecosystem, and suggest action that should be taken to
remedy the situation. Science activities during the week related to aspects of the scenario, which contributed to the campers’
understanding of how different branches of NOAA work together to gather information about environmental events. Campers assessed the
potential impact of the fish kill on fish and marine mammals, examined the bathymetry in the area to see if a ship could have grounded,
determined vessel movements in the area, tested the waters for contaminants, and determined potential point and non-point sources of
pollution. Each group of campers was very creative in presenting their results and recommended response actions to their parents, NOAA
scientists, and Science Camp staff on the last day of camp. By Lisa Hiruki-Raring |
AFSC Quarterly Feature ABL Reports FMA Reports NMML Reports RACE Reports REFM Reports Items Quarterly Index Quarterly Home
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|